The Royal United Services Institute (RUSI), the British protection and safety suppose tank, questions whether or not or not non-fungible token (NFT) belongings can be utilized for cash laundering functions. The report determines that as a way to mitigate the cash laundering dangers a ‘know your customer’ monitoring system “needs to be implemented.”
RUSI: ‘NFT Technology Can Raise Alarm Bells From a Money Laundering and Financial Crime Perspective’
The Royal United Services Institute for Defence and Security Studies in any other case referred to as RUSI, was based in 1831 and it’s the oldest protection and safety suppose tank worldwide. On December 2, RUSI printed a report that covers the topic of non-fungible token (NFT) belongings and the RUSI researchers ask whether or not or not NFTs can contribute to cash laundering schemes.
“This technology can raise alarm bells from a money laundering and financial crime perspective,” RUSI warns. “To start with, NFTs are most often purchased with cryptocurrencies on online marketplaces. Cryptocurrencies are routinely exploited for malicious means, such as obfuscating the source of criminal proceeds and, despite transactions being traceable, more sophisticated criminal actors use a variety of techniques to disrupt investigations by law enforcement.”
The RUSI report referred to as “NFTs: A New Frontier for Money Laundering?” additional states:
A system of ‘know your customer’ insurance policies and ongoing monitoring, just like these used within the conventional artwork market and in compliant cryptocurrency exchanges, must be carried out.
Money Laundering Considered Commonplace in Traditional Art Market — RUSI Researchers Say an ‘Art Heist Is Also Possible Within the NFT Realm’
Money laundering within the conventional artwork scene has been an ongoing debate for many years. The New York Times investigative reporter Graham Bowley explained on June 19, that U.S. politicians need to examine the key artwork market. “Secrecy has long been part of the art market’s mystique, but now lawmakers say they fear it fosters abuses and should be addressed,” Bowley wrote.
RUSI researchers stress that prison actors also can infiltrate NFT markets and leverage “novel risks.” “An art heist is also possible within the NFT realm,” the RUSI report provides. “Criminal actors can hack into user accounts on NFT marketplaces and transfer NFTs to their own accounts. After transferring the NFTs, the hacker can quickly sell the stolen token(s) and attempt to launder the proceeds.”
While RUSI researchers consider that cash laundering within the NFT artwork and collectibles world will be deterred, the report additionally highlights that “NFT forgery and theft can also be mitigated.” RUSI means that NFT marketplaces use two-factor authentication (2FA) options and preserve “good cyber security.” Furthermore, RUSI suggests creating a registry of stolen NFTs that “would mimic the Art Loss Register.”
What do you consider the RUSI report on NFTs and cash laundering dangers? Let us know what you consider this topic within the feedback part beneath.
Image Credits: Shutterstock, Pixabay, Wiki Commons