Sunday, February 28, 2021
Home Pc and Mobiles iPhone and iPad Patent lawsuit targets Apple, Beats wireless headphones and speakers | Appleinsider

Patent lawsuit targets Apple, Beats wireless headphones and speakers | Appleinsider

A lawsuit filed by {hardware} vendor One-E-Method claims a number of Apple and Beats gadgets infringe on a household of patents protecting wireless audio programs.

Lodged with the U.S. District Court docket for the Central District of California on Thursday, One-E-Method’s go well with alleges Apple and Beats merchandise, together with AirPods and Powerbeats fashions, incorporate expertise protected by a household of patents relationship again to 2001.

U.S. Patent Nos. 7,865,258 and 8,131,391, each titled “Wireless digital audio music system,” are leveraged within the motion towards AirPods, AirPods Professional, HomePod, Powerbeats, Powerbeats Professional, Powerbeats 3, Beats Solo Professional, Beats Solo 3, Beats Studio 3, BeatsX and Beats Tablet+. The 258 and 391 patents declare precedence from a patent utility filed in 2001.

Patents-in-suit cowl a way of using code division a number of entry (CDMA) expertise to facilitate “private listening” whereas different close by wireless gadgets are working on the identical frequency band. Additional, the IP employs methods to addresses potential interference from different gadget transmissions. The expertise, in addition to different methods, are in use by gadgets supporting the Bluetooth normal from model by means of 5.2, the go well with notes.

As Bluetooth-capable merchandise, Apple and Beats wireless fashions pair with a number gadget and are assigned a singular person code and “original audio signal representation” to carry out frequency-hopping communication by way of packet knowledge. The gadgets additional implement “reduced intersymbol interference coding” by making use of pulse shaping, CDMA communication, digital-to-analog conversion modules and different belongings per Bluetooth requirements.

The go well with fails to tell apart how the patents-in-suit current novel expertise above and past Bluetooth, although it seems One-E-Method is claiming precedent over the protocol. Why Apple alone is known as as an infringer is unclear.

Apple does incorporate proprietary applied sciences that allow quick gadget switching and sturdy connections by means of its specialised W1 and H1 chips. The {hardware} and supporting software program usually are not talked about in at present’s lawsuit.

One-E-Method seeks royalties, curiosity and courtroom charges in its case.

Supply hyperlink

Leave a Reply

Most Popular

Recent Comments

%d bloggers like this: